Trending Now
Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden ‘cover-up’ as Democrats push Epstein disclosure
Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar amid push for...
Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP for possible government...
Trump’s approval rating holds steady amid deep partisan divide on deportations...
Details of Trump’s highly anticipated AI plan revealed by White House...
Trump declares US will win global AI race during executive order...
House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton in...
Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with firing Democrat-appointed CPSC members
New Russiagate evidence ‘directly’ points to Obama, DOJ will decide ‘criminal...
Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden mental decline ‘cover-up,’ while Democrats push...
Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden ‘cover-up’ as Democrats push Epstein disclosure
Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar amid push for...
Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP for possible government...
Trump’s approval rating holds steady amid deep partisan divide on deportations...
Details of Trump’s highly anticipated AI plan revealed by White House...
Trump declares US will win global AI race during executive order...
House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton in...
Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with firing Democrat-appointed CPSC members
New Russiagate evidence ‘directly’ points to Obama, DOJ will decide ‘criminal...
Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden mental decline ‘cover-up,’ while Democrats push...
Insider Dealing News
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Editor’s Pick
World News

SEN JOHN KENNEDY: Why SCOTUS should seize opportunity to eliminate universal injunctions

by May 15, 2025
written by May 15, 2025

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the argument in a series of cases that ask the court to decide whether individual district court judges can unilaterally stop the federal government from enforcing a law or policy nationwide. The court should jump at the chance to end this practice.

Normally, when a district court sides with a plaintiff’s challenge to a federal policy, the court’s injunction only applies to that plaintiff.

In the 1960s, however, some judges invented a new tool called a universal injunction to impose their will on the country. Instead of addressing the concerns of one plaintiff, these judges began enjoining the government from enforcing the policy against anyone, anywhere. 

The universal injunction gives individual judges extraordinary power. Don’t like a law passed by Congress? Gone. Don’t like an agency’s regulation? Dead. Don’t like one of the president’s policies? Sayonara.

At first, these universal injunctions were uncommon. Courts issued only 27 universal injunctions up until the 21st century. But in recent decades, they have become a fact of life. President Joe Biden faced 14 universal injunctions in his four-year term, and President Donald Trump has surpassed that number in less than four months.

Nowhere does the Constitution say that district courts have this immense power. Nor has Congress ever authorized courts to issue universal injunctions. Universal injunctions also were not recognized in England, where America sourced much of its jurisprudence. 

Judges are issuing national injunctions to cripple the executive branch, says Mark Levin

Yet individual judges around the country still claim they have the authority to bring the entire federal government to a screeching halt with the stroke of a pen.

To make matters worse, judges often issue these universal injunctions after preliminary hearings with limited debate by the parties. There’s no jury. There’s no trial. There’s no real testing of the evidence at all. It also means courts have little time to consider gnarly legal issues. That’s why judges are able to shut down federal policies nationwide within days or even hours.

This practice gives virtually unfettered discretion to the country’s most extreme jurists. The government could successfully defend a policy before hundreds of district judges, but a single judge who disagrees could still wipe out the policy nationwide.

Newt Gingrich sounds alarm on anti-Trump injunctions as possible

Because the injunction can prohibit enforcement of the law or policy anywhere, the federal government understandably feels compelled to immediately appeal the case all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. This rushed process undermines judicial decision-making. 

The Supreme Court prefers when cases take their time and legal issues percolate in the lower courts. That ensures many legal scholars and judges have an opportunity to share their views and fully vet an issue. But universal injunctions often force the Supreme Court to abandon this thorough, deliberative process in favor of a hurried ruling based on half-baked briefs. 

One rogue judge shouldn’t be able to force the Supreme Court to rush on complex legal issues because he or she assumed the power to enjoin a federal policy nationwide.

Lawmaker presents bill to curb nationwide injunctions

This isn’t an ideological issue. Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan have all expressed concerns about universal injunctions short-circuiting the American judicial system. Nor is this a partisan issue. Solicitor generals for both Presidents Biden and Trump have asked the Supreme Court to put an end to universal injunctions.

These individuals understand better than anyone that the rampant use of universal injunctions by district court judges is threatening to destabilize the judiciary, and indeed, our entire system of government. I hope the court will take advantage of the opportunity to end this unlawful practice once and for all. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Republicans struggle with Trump’s mixed signals on ‘big, beautiful bill’
next post
Trump warns Iran faces ‘violence like people haven’t seen before’ if nuclear deal fails

Related Posts

Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden ‘cover-up’ as Democrats...

July 23, 2025

Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar...

July 23, 2025

Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP...

July 23, 2025

Trump’s approval rating holds steady amid deep partisan...

July 23, 2025

Details of Trump’s highly anticipated AI plan revealed...

July 23, 2025

Trump declares US will win global AI race...

July 24, 2025

House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and...

July 23, 2025

Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with firing...

July 23, 2025

New Russiagate evidence ‘directly’ points to Obama, DOJ...

July 23, 2025

Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden mental decline ‘cover-up,’...

July 23, 2025

Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden ‘cover-up’ as Democrats...

July 23, 2025

Trump admin official to meet with Israel, Qatar...

July 23, 2025

Schumer, Democrats try to save face, blame GOP...

July 23, 2025

Trump’s approval rating holds steady amid deep partisan...

July 23, 2025

Details of Trump’s highly anticipated AI plan revealed...

July 23, 2025

Trump declares US will win global AI race...

July 24, 2025

House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and...

July 23, 2025

Supreme Court says Trump can proceed with firing...

July 23, 2025

New Russiagate evidence ‘directly’ points to Obama, DOJ...

July 23, 2025

Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden mental decline ‘cover-up,’...

July 23, 2025







    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News





    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 InsiderDealingNews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Insider Dealing News
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Editor’s Pick